Topic: Comparison of ADI2 DAC with ADI2 PRO or what a gain SteadyClock FS

Comparison of ADI2 DAC with ADI2 PRO SteadyClock FS


https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?attachments/rme-adi-2-dac-vs-adi-2-pro-noise-and-jitter-measurement-comparison-png.12251/

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/foru … png.12252/

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/foru … png.12253/

2

Re: Comparison of ADI2 DAC with ADI2 PRO or what a gain SteadyClock FS

What is the purpose of this post?

Regards
Matthias Carstens
RME

3 (edited by HIFI 2018-04-28 06:29:19)

Re: Comparison of ADI2 DAC with ADI2 PRO or what a gain SteadyClock FS

MC wrote:

What is the purpose of this post?

Help you personally to finally show the difference to the users who asked about it what SteadyClock FS gives. Officially from the PME manufacturer, they did not wait to see the diagrams about SteadyClock FS in ADI2 DAC. There is no updated instructions for ADI2 DAC.

You can personally remind the manufacturer about the update instructions for ADI2 DAC that would remove all questions about the characteristics and SteadyClock FS?

4 (edited by ramses 2018-04-28 08:21:36)

Re: Comparison of ADI2 DAC with ADI2 PRO or what a gain SteadyClock FS

Sorry, but I don't get what you say in your post #3

Instead of giving an answer to post #2 it puts up even more questions, i.e.:

What you mean by "officially from the RME manufacturer"? If you talk in this forum with Matthias Carstens then you talk with RME. What "updated instructions" ? Why "remind" the manufacturer about "update instructions" ?

And why for the ADI-2 DAC? The ADI-2 DAC has FS clock. The only device which doesn't have FS clock is the original ADI-2 Pro.

It would be very kind if you could clarify and make the purpose of your post #1 clear, many thanks.

BR Ramses - UFX III, 12Mic, XTC, ADI-2 Pro FS R BE, RayDAT, X10SRi-F, E5-1680v4, Win10Pro22H2, Cub13

5 (edited by HIFI 2018-04-28 08:57:00)

Re: Comparison of ADI2 DAC with ADI2 PRO or what a gain SteadyClock FS

ramses wrote:

Sorry, but I don't get what you say in your post #3

Instead of giving an answer to post #2 it puts up even more questions, i.e.:

What you mean by "officially from the RME manufacturer"? If you talk in this forum with Matthias Carstens then you talk with RME. What "updated instructions" ? Why "remind" the manufacturer about "update instructions" ?

And why for the ADI-2 DAC? The ADI-2 DAC has FS clock. The only device which doesn't have FS clock is the original ADI-2 Pro.

It would be very kind if you could clarify and make the purpose of your post #1 clear, many thanks.

Why ask strange questions if you do not understand what I wrote about.
Sorry but you first read the instruction manual for ADI2 DAC. There are no exact characteristics and visual measurements of SteadyClock FS.

Unlike the instructions for ADI2 PRO FS where there is a comparison with the usual version of ADI2 PRO.There is a graph of the differences this one

http://prosound.ixbt.com/news/2018/april/13/steadyclockfs.jpg

Officially, the PME did not correct the instruction for ADI2 DAC to show the pros from SteadyClock FS. Therefore, I'm staking for users the measurement of SteadyClock FS.

6

Re: Comparison of ADI2 DAC with ADI2 PRO or what a gain SteadyClock FS

Since when do manuals offer comparisons (and especially technical measurement comparisons) between different units? Someone who buys the DAC does not need to know what the old Pro does or does not. That would just blow up the manual even more.

Thread closed.

Regards
Matthias Carstens
RME